TO: The Regional Municipality of Durham
AND TO: The Ontario Municipal Board
AND TO: all other Appellants, Parties and Participants in this matter
FROM: Rosemary McConkey
RE: OMB Case No. 101409
AND RE: Board Decision issued November 25, 2011 re: Memorandum of Oral Decision by Susan B. Campbell on October 31, 2011 and Order of the Board, Adjustments to Schedule 1, Paragraph #6,
_________________________________________________________
Further to the request of the Board that Appellants make best efforts by November 30, 2011 to scope their appeals by identifying to the Region the specific policies and specific portions of the schedules that the Appellant intends to challenge in Phase I of the hearing, please be advised as follows:
The Appellant, Rosemary McConkey, has been the facilitator of a community coalition in the Hamlet of Columbus since March 2009. At that time Hamlet of Columbus neighbours first became aware of the Growing Durham Plan and joined together out of shared concerns and a public interest in protecting and strengthening the Hamlet of Columbus for the future.
McConkey, with the endorsement of the majority of Hamlet of Columbus households, objects to the Region's redesignation of Columbus area lands, specifically to the land north of the future 407E extension along the Simcoe St. at the gateway to the historic Hamlet being inappropriately redesignated to Employment; and to the Region's failure to indicate or justify an apparent deletion of the Hamlet of Columbus "Hamlet" designation.
McConkey submits that ROPA 128 as it relates to the Columbus area is inconsistent with provincial planning policies, not only disregards the paradigm shift in good public policy and planning priorities of the past decade, but also is inconsistent with Goals and Directions set out by the Region in Section 1.2 & 1.3 and Environment Goals in Section 2.
McConkey objects to the Region's employment forecasts indicated in Policy 3.2.2 Policies 7.3.3 and 7.3.4 and specifically to its 1 job to 2 persons formula and relies on the Province's employment ratio to support the position that the designation of the Employment land south of the Hamlet of Columbus is rushed and unnecessary.
The land budgeting process with regard to the Columbus area lands has been negligent and arbitrary as evidenced by errors identifying the Columbus area as currently urban rather than contemplated urban in mapping November 2008; and the last minute amendment put forward by a member of Council June 3, 2009 designating back to agricultural land that had up until May, 2009 been included in the Region's plan to redesignate to urban and employment. (Schedule A, Map A4 Regional Structure)
Please note that given the 'meeting of experts' is yet to occur, McConkey requests the opportunity to identify further and other specific policies and specific portions to challenge the proponent's Official Plan Amendment related to the Columbus area.